Skip to content

Possibly prefix message from R/RcppLdPath.R with Rcpp::: #1456

@eddelbuettel

Description

@eddelbuettel

Brian Ripley just added checks to r-devel 1 to look for the message we emit from R/RcppLdPath.R for the long-deprecated use of things like LdFlags() (that we reactivated in PR #1413 addressing issue #1412. He notes (in email) that

I did wonder if would be worth your reporting as Rcpp:::LdFlags but I guess the maintainers (whose code invoked this) ought to know where is comes from.

which is a fair point. We could prefix with Rcpp:::.

Footnotes

  1. In SVN r89436 which is mirrored here

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions